<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Progressive Sundae: - Recent Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com</link>
    <description>Progressive Sundae:</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:41:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax</title>
      <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=367</link>
      <description>Syntaxn &amp; manners: He sounds strange when you talk to him &amp; he did not even want to sell me what I wanted. He tried to impress me that he knows more than I do, and then sell me on whatever he thinks is best. I always did business with the thought or at least the impression that the customer always knows best. I think he has a surpeority complex. Sarah Palin puts words together than this bloke.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>paulworkman69atyahoo</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=367</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fred Klaske</title>
      <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=366</link>
      <description>I ran into Fred Klaske at Fidelity Roof Company. I wanted to buy a solar system for my company, but after meeting this guy, I just couldn't imagine doing business with such a strange one. I would say that this guy is bad for the environment. I would rather burn coal than work with someone like this. I dod a google and found your article. Thanks for the heads up &amp; letting me know that my intuition has backing. Hard to believe that he didn't even live in the district that he was running in. What a waste of $100K. Glad it was not my money.&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;pw</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>paulworkman69atyahoo</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=366</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How committed are you?</title>
      <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=365</link>
      <description>I would be proud to join my colleagues in the Progressive Caucus in signing the aforementioned petition to the Administration and Secretary Sebelius.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;I am committed to standing behind the public option as the primary mechanism of health care reform.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the opportunity to highlight my commitment to this issue.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Senator Mark DeSaulnier</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mark_DeSaulnier</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=365</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How committed are you?</title>
      <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=364</link>
      <description>If elected, would you sign onto &lt;a href=http://firedoglake.com/files/1/files//2009/08/sec-sebelius-ltr-081709.pdf&gt;this letter to Secty. Kathleen Sebelius&lt;/a&gt; stating that you would not vote for a health care plan without a public option?&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;August 17, 2009&#xD;&lt;p&gt;The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Secretary, U.S. Department of Health &amp; Human Services&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20201&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Dear Secretary Sebelius,&#xD;&lt;p&gt;We write to you concerning your recent comments about the public option in health insurance reform.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;We stand in strong opposition to your statement that the public option is "not the essential element" of comprehensive reform. The opportunity to improve access to healthcare is a onetime opportunity. Americans deserve reform that is real-not smoke and mirrors. We cannot rely solely on the insurance companies' good faith efforts to provide for our constituents. A robust public option is essential, if we are to ensure that all Americans can receive healthcare that is accessible, guaranteed and of high-quality.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;To take the public option off the table would be a grave error; passage in the House of Representatives depends upon inclusion of it.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;We have attached, for your review, a letter from 60 Members of Congress who are firm in their Position that any legislation that moves forward through both chambers, and into a final proposal for the President's signature, MUST contain a public option.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Raul Grijalva&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Co-Chair&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Congressional Progressive Caucus 	&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Lynn Woolsey&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Co-Chair&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Congressional Progressive Caucus 	&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Barbara Lee&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Co-Chair&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Congressional Black Caucus&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>babaloo</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=364</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not illegal</title>
      <link>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=363</link>
      <description>Katie doesn't need to say anything. As the letter states, nothing has been done that is illegal. This letter is merely a request. The State Department has no standing in US elections, the FEC does. This is a desperate ploy by a desperate campaign. ....and the beat goes on.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>corsair</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressivesundae.com/showComment.do?commentId=363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

